Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15
I am almost asham’d to acknowledge how long it has been since I wrote you last, and can only hope you will consider my numerous letters to my brother, most of which I intended as much for you as for him, to be a sufficient apology— I have not received a line from you or from my father since last June, though I think it impossible but that you should have written more than once— My last letter to my father was of November 25.1
My mind has deeply shared in all the anxieties, the 3 disappointments and afflictions both of a public and private nature, which have
befallen you, crowded into so small a space of time— The loss of my brother Charles— The
illness of my father—and the manner in which his country rewarded a life of labours
devoted to their service, were all events which I knew must call forth the fortitude and
energy of his soul and of your’s.— The death of my brother affected me greatly— I first
learnt it by a letter from my kind friend Mr: Murray, who
had seen it mentioned in a newspaper— Two days after it was confirmed in a letter I
received from my brother Thomas— The illness of my father and the result of the election
I was informed of at the same time, by the English and German newspapers— Five weeks
have since elapsed during which I have not had a single line from America.— Mr: Murray my constant and valuable correspondent has informed
me very lately that he had seen in a New-York paper a paragraph stating my father’s
having recovered from his fever, which it was a great consolation to me to hear from any
quarter, and which I hope will soon be made certain to me by more direct
intelligence—2 The issue of the
election I could not suppose would be an object of indifference to him; but I knew he
had always been impressed fully with the sentiment, that every man who serves the
public, must look upon the injustice of men, so far as it concerns himself, in the same
light, as upon the ills of nature; the shocks that flesh is heir to,3—a fever, or a clap of thunder—which are neither
to be denied for real evils, nor to be complained of as avoidable— Political
disappointment is perhaps one of the occasions in human life which requires the greatest
portion of philosophy; and although philosophy has very little power to asswage the
keenness of our feelings, she has at least the power to silence the voice of complaint—
To be relieved from the labours and responsibility of such a station as that of an
American President, is a great consolation for all the pain of being removed from it,
and will I hope have its full weight as such.
What the influence of the change in our Administration, upon the
reputation and fortunes, of our Country may be, I do not think it necessary to enquire,
and am altogether unable to foresee. For the past alone my
father has any thing on this score to answer— For the future, the whole responsibility
rests upon the people themselves— If they find themselves after an experience of their
new system as more prosperous than they have been
under the old, the pure and generous spirit of patriotism, will rejoyce in their
prosperity, and forget their injustice— But if the principles, to which they have
thought proper to transfer their trust, should prove delusive, and 4 bring upon them, the miseries of broken public faith, of disunion, or of War, deeply
will their sufferings be lamented by the pure and virtuous friend of his Country, but he
will find comfort in the reflection that he had done all in his power to ward off those
calamities; and that the people could not have exposed themselves to their effects, but
by first abandoning him.
I have hitherto for the last four years written seldom to my father, because I knew that all my public correspondence would be laid before him— For the future however (while I remain in Europe) I shall write oftener, to inform him of the principal political events which may occur. I say while I remain in Europe, because I am in expectation of my recall, immediately upon the new President’s coming into office—4 He will doubtless have nothing personal against me; but my mission here has been one of the most powerful objections made against the policy of his predecessor, and I presume therefore will be one of the first objects that he will think it expedient to reform.— The use and advantage of having some public character in the North of Europe, is indeed at this time more immediate, and nearer the surface of evidence than it has been at any former period since I have resided here; but those who deem’d the mission inexpedient at first, will probably find motives, if not reasons, equally strong for thinking it so still.
The North of Europe, and the views, interests, and relations of the
several states it contains, are indeed becoming an object of no small concern to our
commerce— Russia, Sweden, Denmark and Prussia, while I write this are upon the brink of
War with Great-Britain, upon one common point of issue, but each separately guided by
purposes of its own, and each pledging to the contest a different stake.5 If this quarrel should really break out, The
United-States will be the only maritime nation remaining neutral, and their navigation
will be needed by all the hostile parties to carry a trade alike necessary for all, but
which none will be allowed to transport in their own vessels— Our navigation to and from
the Baltic therefore must acquire a great and rapid extension; and as the carrying trade
of Sweden and Denmark must in the nature of things be suspended, our vessels will be no
less in demand for the commerce of the mediterranean.— It is possible that this state of
things, and the events resulting from it, will convince some of our keen-eyed and large
soul’d politicians, that Treaties of commerce with Russia and the Sublime Porte, made
two years ago, would not have been such a useless waste of public 5 money, nor such a proof of absurd policy, as their comprehensive minds represented
it— A most profound and ingenious statesman, I remember, has urged in a printed
pamphlet, the recommendation of these measures by the late President, as a proof of his
incapacity.
6
That the War will kindle into a blaze, is not however certain—
Great-Britain, who would make but little account of the resentments of Sweden and
Denmark, cannot look with so much indifference upon those of Prussia and of Russia— She
has talk’d very loud and bluster’d very much about her rights, and her essential
interests and her determination to resist any combination
against them, but I suspect when it comes to the putting of the match to the
powder-barrel, she will flinch; or, that she will bribe off the great parties to the
league; at the expence of the small ones, if she can; but that she will at any rate
bribe them off— Unless it should already be too late.
Of English news I need not tell you— That part of Europe, and its occurrences are tolerably well known in our country, and you must hear from it more accurately and sooner by direct communication than I could inform you, thus distant from it— The change of Ministry, and the king’s illness, are the two most important late events, of which the consequences are yet covered by the veil of Time7
In France the career of the first Consul’s prosperity continues,
and Fortune is as profuse of her favours to him as ever— That he is an extraordinary
man, there can at this day be no doubt; but whether his niche in the temple of Fame,
will be in a line with Alexander, Caesar, and Charlemagne, or with Hannibal, Pompey and
Charles the twelfth of Sweden, no mortal I believe can foretell— It is only certain that
he will not stand in that of Alfred, Gustavus Wasa and Washington—8 He has not yet entirely kicked away the ladder
of Jacobinism, which so well served his Ambition, because he is not yet perfectly secure
of his footing, at the pernicious height where he has ascended; but he is no longer as
after the Peace of Campo Formio the common-place declaimer against Emperors and kings—
In the name of the french people, he takes the sceptred
despots by the hand, and as he looks at the gold and jewels of their crowns, feels a
mysterious sympathetic itching play around his own temples—9 Yet if the crown were offered him to-morrow, he
would refuse it as Caesar and Cromwell did before.
I am just at the bottom of my paper, and have yet said nothing to you about ourselves. My own health, since the beginning of the Winter has been good— Louisa’s better upon the whole than any 6 former winter since she came to Berlin, but still very feeble and delicate— She desires her dutiful remembrance to you and to my father— The season, since the middle of December has been unusually gay and splendid in the courtly circles, owing to the presence of a Russian Grand-Duchess upon a visit—10 But I have been a great measure exempted from attendance at the house of feasting, by the call to one which we are told by the highest wisdom, is better.
I am in all duty and affection, your Son
RC (Adams
Papers); internal address: “Mrs: A. Adams.”;
endorsed by Louisa Catharine Smith: “March 1801—” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 134. Tr (Adams
Papers).
JQA last wrote to AA on 11 July 1800 and to JA on 25 November. In June and early July 1800 he received a letter from JA of 28 Feb. and one from AA of 15 May, respectively (vol. 14:161, 237–240, 286, 445–454). For his many letters from Silesia to TBA during the period, see vol. 14:305–368.
For the letters JQA received reporting CA’s Nov. 1800 death and for the press reports on the U.S. election and JA’s health, see vol. 14:442, 559–560, 561–562. William Vans Murray informed JQA in a 24 Feb. 1801 letter that a 7 Jan. New York newspaper reported JA’s recovery from illness (Adams Papers).
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act III, scene
i, lines 70–71.
JA ordered JQA’s recall on 31 Jan., and Secretary of State John Marshall’s 3 Feb. letter of recall reached JQA on 26 April (vol. 14:555–556). For JQA’s communication of his recall to King Frederick William III of Prussia and his return to the United States with LCA and GWA, see JQA to JA, 1 May, and note 1, below.
For the increasing friction between Britain and Sweden, Denmark, and Russia over the renewal of the Armed Neutrality of 1780 and the resulting Battle of Copenhagen, see JQA to TBA, 28 March 1801, and note 5, and 4 April, and note 8, both below.
In Feb. 1799 JA sought to open U.S. negotiations for
treaties of amity and commerce with Russia and the Ottoman Empire, prompting Dr.
Thomas Cooper to claim in an 1800 pamphlet that the president’s diplomatic overtures
were among the actions considered dubious by “those who doubted his capacity.”
Cooper’s pamphlet may have been one of the publications that AA promised
to send in a 27 April 1800 letter to JQA. Four days after receiving
AA’s letter, JQA expounded on the pamphlet in a 10 July
letter to TBA (vols. 13:410, 550; 14:218–220, 294–295; Thomas Cooper, An Account of the Trial of Thomas Cooper, of
Northumberland, Phila., 1800, p. 6–8, Evans, No. 37249).
William Pitt resigned as prime minister of Britain on 5 Feb. 1801
as a result of growing tensions with King George III, who maintained an active role in
government despite a return of the erratic behavior that had provoked the Regency
Crisis of 1789. Henry Addington succeeded Pitt on 14 March 1801 (
Cambridge Modern
Hist.
, 9:677–680; JA, Papers
, 19:360).
Gustavus I, or Gustavus Vasa (1496–1560), claimed the Swedish
throne after expelling the Danes in 1523. Charles XII (1682–1718) became king of
Sweden in 1697 and was successful in waging wars against Denmark and Norway (
Cambridge Modern
Hist.
, 2:621–622; 4:158; 5:576, 580–581, 583).
As JQA suggested, Napoleon used republican rhetoric
at the time of the 17 Oct. 1797 Treaty of Campo Formio but employed more-imperial
terms in the 9 Feb. 1801 Treaty of Lunéville. In presenting the Campo Formio treaty to
the Directory, Napoleon declared that “the French people, in order to be free, had
kings to combat” and “the prejudices of eighteen centuries to overcome.” The
introductory paragraph of the earlier treaty likewise described an agreement between
Emperor Francis II of Austria and “the French Republic,” while that of the later
treaty announced a pact between Francis and “the First Consul of the French Republic,”
even though, as JQA noted, it also included the statement that Napoleon
was acting “in the name of the French people” (vols. 12:272, 7
14:464; Ida M. Tarbell, ed.,
Napoleon’s Addresses, Boston, 1897, p. 48; Frank Maloy
Anderson, The Constitutions and Other Select Documents
Illustrative of the History of France, 1789–1901, Minneapolis, Minn., 1904, p.
261–267, 290–294).
Russian grand duchess Elena Pavlovna (1784–1803), daughter of
Emperor Paul 1 and Empress Maria Feodorovna, twice visited Berlin in 1801.
JQA attended her presentation at court on 29 Jan. (Joseph Baillio,
Katharine Baetjer, Paul Lang, Vigée Le Brun, N.Y., 2016,
p. 176; [Constance] Richardson, Memoirs of the Private Life
and Opinions of Louisa, Queen of Prussia, 2d edn., London, 1848, p. 87;
D/JQA/24, APM
Reel 27).
th.1801
Permit Me, dear Madam, to offer My thanks for Your care of letters,
from Our dear Children— And to congratulate You on your return to peace feild.
1
I feel assured that You and Yours, will injoy a tranquility, that is Not in the power of the World to give, Or take away— I reflect
with triumph that M r Adams can
adopt those pleaseing lines of Our favourite Poet—
May I confess? that I feel My indignation rise against Such as have
been Accessary to the displaceing, of the Man, who for Such
a Number of Years has Made Sacrifices beyound calculation for the promotion of his
Country’s good.—
I mourn that any have deni’d him, the only recompence they could bestow.— but rejoice that a Number is yet left, (And Not the least respectable) that will ever do honour to that Character they So Much esteem.— And for whom their every wish, is to See supported by the powers above. And long continu’d as a blessing to his connections, And the delight of his friends. Among whom Suffer Me to place My first friend— And dear Madam / Your Affectionate
P S. My Daughters join me in offers of love to Miss Smith—
RC (Adams
Papers); internal address: “Mrs. Adams.”
After departing Washington, D.C., on 13 Feb., AA arrived in Quincy on 10 March (vol. 14:559).
Alexander Pope, “The First Epistle of the First Book of Horace,” lines 93–94.